2026 Cyber Insurance Trends: The “Soft” Market Paradox & The AI Exclusion Trap

Audience: Insurance agents, brokers, and risk managers looking to protect clients in a rapidly changing cyber risk environment.

As 2026 gets underway, cyber insurance is sending mixed signals to agents and business owners. On one hand, the market feels soft: capacity is plentiful, competition is intense, and many insureds are seeing flat or modestly lower premiums at renewal.

On the other hand, policy language is tightening in some of the most important areas of emerging risk, especially around artificial intelligence and deepfake-enabled fraud. The result is a soft market paradox: coverage looks affordable at a glance, but dangerous gaps may be hiding in the fine print.


The Good News: Premiums and Capacity in 2026

After several hard-market years driven by ransomware losses and rapidly rising claim severity, 2026 is bringing more stable conditions for many cyber buyers. Additional capital, innovative reinsurance structures, and the entrance of new players are helping carriers compete more aggressively on price and limits.

  • Markets in the United States and other mature regions are seeing essentially flat pricing on average, a sharp contrast with the double-digit increases common in 2021–2023.
  • Alternative risk transfer tools and insurance-linked securities have attracted more capacity into cyber, making it easier to place larger towers and complex programs than just a few years ago.
  • Some sectors that strengthened controls after major ransomware waves are benefiting from lower loss frequency, which supports more competitive terms for better-managed risks.

For agents, this creates a window of opportunity to help clients improve limits, close long-standing sublimits, or consolidate fragmented programs without facing the sticker shock seen earlier in the decade.


The Bad News: The AI Exclusion Trap

The same forces that make the market soft are also pushing carriers to carefully ring‑fence exposures they still struggle to quantify, and AI is at the top of that list. As general liability and other traditional lines roll out absolute AI exclusions, more of the burden is shifting onto cyber and tech E&O forms, where insurers are rewriting terms to avoid silent AI coverage.


1. AI Governance and “Unauthorized” AI Use

Many organizations now rely on generative AI tools for coding, content creation, analysis, and customer support, often through a mix of sanctioned and unsanctioned applications. In response, some cyber underwriters are drafting exclusions that treat incidents stemming from unapproved or poorly governed AI tools as uncovered negligence rather than insured errors or omissions.

An example scenario is a developer pasting proprietary source code into a public chatbot, which later contributes to a data exposure or intellectual property dispute. Under broad AI exclusions, carriers may argue that the organization’s failure to control or govern employee AI use voids coverage, even though the loss looks like a traditional privacy or confidentiality event.


2. AI “Hallucinations,” Content Liability, and IP Risk

As businesses publish AI-generated marketing copy, product documentation, and customer communications, they face new risks from inaccurate, defamatory, or infringing content produced by large language models. Several commentators expect cyber and media liability policies to more explicitly exclude or restrict coverage for losses tied to AI “hallucinations,” misstatements, or copyright violations unless insureds purchase specialized endorsements.

Where policies used to be silent, carriers are now clarifying that liability for AI-authored content may fall outside standard insuring agreements, especially when organizations rely on third‑party platforms they do not control.


3. Deepfake Social Engineering and Shrinking Sublimits

Deepfake video, audio, and synthetic text have transformed social engineering attacks by making executive impersonation more convincing than traditional phishing. In several widely reported cases, deepfake-enabled fraud has driven multimillion‑dollar wire transfers and high‑value ransomware negotiations, creating losses far above the modest social engineering sublimits common in legacy crime policies.

To contain this exposure, many carriers are excluding AI-generated synthetic media from standard social engineering coverage or introducing tight sublimits that only apply if the insured follows specific verification protocols for suspected deepfake scenarios. Some specialized cyber programs, however, are beginning to offer affirmative deepfake coverage with expanded services such as forensic analysis, takedown support, and crisis communications.


The Soft Market Paradox for Agents

The paradox for 2026 is that falling or flat premiums can mask a fundamental shift in what the policy actually covers. Many exclusions and endorsements aimed at AI, systemic outages, and state‑sponsored attacks are buried deep in manuscript wording, where they are easy to miss during a quick renewal review.

For agents and brokers, the competitive advantage this year is not just finding the lowest rate, but proving that the policy aligns with how clients use AI, cloud services, and digital channels in the real world.


Key Areas to Watch in 2026 Policy Forms

  • AI risk allocation: Look for how each policy handles AI-related errors, unauthorized AI use by employees, and reliance on third‑party AI platforms, including any broad AI exclusions that may swallow core coverages.
  • Systemic and catastrophic events: Examine language around systemic infrastructure failures, such as widespread outages at major cloud or IT service providers, and understand any aggregate or per‑event limits that apply to shared incidents.
  • Social engineering and deepfakes: Confirm whether definitions of social engineering fraud and computer fraud specifically address AI-generated synthetic media, and whether voluntary parting and “direct communication” requirements could block recovery for deepfake-enabled losses.


The 2026 Cyber Renewal Checklist for Agents

Before binding a 2026 cyber renewal, agents can use a simple, practical checklist to help clients avoid AI-related coverage surprises. These questions are especially important for organizations that are rapidly adopting generative AI or expanding their digital footprint.

1. How Does the Policy Treat Authorized vs. Unauthorized AI Use?

Ask whether the form distinguishes between AI tools that are formally approved and governed by the organization and ad hoc tools used by individual employees. Clarify whether coverage extends to incidents where an employee misuses a sanctioned AI system but still acts within the scope of their employment and documented procedures.

2. Are Systemic Infrastructure Failures Clearly Addressed?

Review exclusions and sublimits tied to failures of shared infrastructure such as major cloud platforms, widely used security tools, or core internet services. Recent large‑scale outages have demonstrated that a single event can affect thousands of insureds at once, prompting some carriers to narrow contingent business interruption and dependent system coverage for systemic incidents.

3. Does Social Engineering Coverage Explicitly Include Deepfakes?

Confirm whether social engineering, cybercrime, or funds transfer fraud agreements explicitly cover AI-generated voice, video, and text used to impersonate executives or trusted third parties. Work with underwriters to adjust sublimits, conditions, and verification requirements so they reflect the client’s realistic threat profile and operational capabilities.

Bonus: Align Controls, Documentation, and Training

Finally, encourage clients to update their governance frameworks to match the policy’s expectations by documenting AI usage guidelines, deepfake response protocols, and cloud dependency mapping. Strong internal controls and training not only reduce loss likelihood but also improve underwriting outcomes and support favorable pricing in a competitive market.

What This Means for Your Clients in 2026

The 2026 cyber insurance landscape offers a welcome break from the sharp premium increases of prior years, but it also demands closer attention to exclusions and definitions than ever before. In a soft market, the real value you provide as an agent is helping clients trade slightly higher premiums, where necessary, for policies that actually respond to modern AI-driven threats.

By carefully reviewing AI-related language, deepfake coverage, and systemic risk provisions, you can help organizations avoid trading comprehensive protection for short‑term savings. In a year when technology and regulation are moving quickly, that diligence may be the difference between a covered loss and a costly uncovered event.

Helpful External Resources